Amplify Amplify your take on things.  Join Nathan Rein on Amplify

Findings

Why we didn’t catch the underwear bomber: too much information, too little analysis

Since the passage of the PATRIOT act and the creation of related data-gathering efforts, various U.S. intelligence agencies have amassed mind-bogglingly huge collections of data (at an unprecedented cost to privacy and constitutionally-protected civil liberties, I might add, but let's forget about that for now). The problem is, no one really knows what to do with... read more

Amplifyd from online.wsj.com

Too Much Information

Something is broken. After the expense of billions of dollars in new data vacuums, disruptive bureaucratic restructuring, and more than eight years of human effort, the government has become expert at collecting the dots about terrorist attacks, those fragmentary clues gathered up in the massive, constant sweep. But it is not very good at connecting the dots, at forming them into a coherent narrative that can forecast events like those of Christmas Day.

The master database of terrorist names, TIDE, contains half a million records. Following the failed attack in December, Mr. Obama directed that the intelligence community immediately go through them to see if any of the individuals had been issued U.S. visas.
We’re collecting names. Hundreds of thousands of them. And yet we’re not systematically checking if these people have already been granted entry to the United States. Read more at online.wsj.com
 

Edward Luce on why Obama is failing, from the Finanical Times

You may or may not agree with this perspective, but it's important, and the guy most certainly knows whereof he speaks. URL:  www.ft.com

“Corporate personhood”? Why not canine personhood?

If the Supreme Court can build an argument around the idea that a corporation is a legal person, then why not dogs too?

Amplifyd from tannenweekly.com
Poodles demand legal rights as “people”
Attorneys for the Poodle Coalition of America today announced a lawsuit to grant poodles the same rights the Supreme Court recently gave to corporations.
“If the court claims that corporations — which are legal entities that exist only to make money — are ‘people,’ surely poodles are even more qualified,” said an attorney.

The lawsuit argues that dogs, unlike corporations, show the essential human traits of empathy, love and loyalty.

“How many corporations exhibit even a trace of the very elements that define a ‘person’?” the attorney asked.
“Some folks may snicker,” said a Poodle Coalition spokesperson, “but dogs inherit hundreds of millions of dollars each year from their owners. In fact, the late Leona Helmsley’s dog, ‘Trouble,’ inherited $12 million from Mrs. Helmsley’s estate.”

“There’s no reason why ‘Trouble’ shouldn’t be allowed to finance any political candidate who is good for dogdom.”Read more at tannenweekly.com
 

Satan to Pat Robertson: “You’re making me look bad”

I’ve been trying not to pay too much attention to Pat Robertson and his shenanigans, but this letter to him, written by Satan himself (channeled by a reader of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and sent to the paper’s editors) is too good not to post.

Amplifyd from www.startribune.com
Dear Pat Robertson, I know that you know that all press is good press, so I appreciate the shout-out. And you make God look like a big mean bully who kicks people when they are down, so I’m all over that action.
But when you say that Haiti has made a pact with me, it is totally humiliating. I may be evil incarnate, but I’m no welcher. The way you put it, making a deal with me leaves folks desperate and impoverished.
Those Haitians have nothing, and I mean nothing.
If I had a thing going with Haiti, there’d be lots of banks, skyscrapers, SUVs, exclusive night clubs, Botox — that kind of thing. An 80 percent poverty rate is so not my style.
You’re doing great work, Pat, and I don’t want to clip your wings — just, come on, you’re making me look bad. And not the good kind of bad. Keep blaming God. That’s working. But leave me out of it, please. Or we may need to renegotiate your own contract. Best, Satan Read more at www.startribune.com
 

“Want to save marriage? Ban divorce,” by Candace Chellew-Hodge (@revtheodyke)

A good, short opinion piece by Candace Chellew-Hodge (@revtheodyke) on John Marcotte’s effort to get a new, Proposition 8-like measure placed on the ballot in California to “protect traditional marriage” by making divorce illegal. After all, she points out, Jesus never mentions homosexuality, but he sure does have a problem with divorce.

Want to Save Marriage? Ban Divorce
Among “born-again” Christians, 27 percent currently are divorced or previously have been divorced, compared with 24 percent among adults who are not “born again.” Surprisingly, the Barna report said, the Christian group whose adherents have the highest likelihood of getting divorced are Baptists.
John Marcotte wants to put a measure on the ballot next year to ban divorce in California.
Ah, Jesus, remember him? Even though he said not one word about homosexuality in his entire ministry — those who oppose marriage equality for gays and lesbians continue to invoke his name to deny equal rights to an entire group of human beings. All the while, they ignore his words against divorce as quaint and antiquated.
It would be nice to be able to go to the polls and vote on someone else’s civil rights for a change. It would also be nice to finally show those who have voted to take away my rights what it feels like to be a second class citizen in America.Read more at www.religiondispatches.org
 

The real threat to “traditional” marriage: heterosexual couples who don’t think the way they’re supposed to

The money quote: "There is a greater expectation that women will work, men will be more involved with their children, and household duties will be more evenly shared... In essence, straight couples are 'queering' heterosexual marriage... If neither partner conforms to his or her 'unique role,' heterosexual marriage starts to look like its same-sex counterpart and... read more

Amplifyd from www.patheos.com
Balanced Views of Religion and Spirituality

A Real Challenge to Marriage

The ongoing objection to same-sex marriage by the Catholic church seems to be predicated not only on the old procreation argument, but also on a stubborn attachment to specific gender roles, as evidenced by the reiteration of the validity of marriage of heterosexual couples who are unable to procreate. The trouble for the bishops is that while these gender roles are still prevalent, they are continuing to fall away. 

In addition to biology, there is the “unique role” argument.

While the church in recent times, as well as in this document, has tried very hard to emphasize the equality of women in heterosexual marriages there is still a strong emphasis on a nebulous “difference” between wives and husbands.

To maintain the church’s teaching on procreation as the basis for marriage, the burden falls disproportionately to women.

Read more at www.patheos.com
 

UN rights commissioner: time to “eradicate the shameful concept of caste”

Wow. This is fascinating.

Amplifyd from www.ahrchk.net
Asian Human Rights Commission - Statement
A Statement from Ms. Navanethem Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights forwarded by the Asian Human Rights Commission
WORLD: Tearing down the wall of caste
Caste is the very negation of the human rights principles of equality and non-discrimination. It condemns individuals from birth and their communities to a life of exploitation, violence, social exclusion and segregation. Caste-discrimination is not only a human rights violation, but also exposes those affected to other abuses of their civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.
The time has come to eradicate the shameful concept of caste. Other seemingly insurmountable walls, such as slavery and apartheid, have been dismantled in the past. We can and must tear down the barriers of caste too.Read more at www.ahrchk.net
 

Durga Puja is coming up. Swami Sivananda says: do not sacrifice animals for Devi

Commentary from Swami Sivananda, founder of the Divine Life society, on the observance of Durga Puja. Traditionally, animal sacrifice has often been a part of the ritual, but Sivananda declares this a violation of the principle of ahimsa, which is binding on all Hindus no matter what caste, jati, or situation they belong to. An interesting example of second-order discourse in contemporary non-Western religion.

Amplifyd from www.hindu-blog.com
Hindu Blog

Animal Sacrifice during Durga Puja Navratri and Dashain is Himsa and should not be practiced – Swami Sivananda

Offer to Goddess Durga the animal, the Pashu, of your inner evil trait of passion, of anger, of greed. Do not kill animals of the external world in the name of Balidana to the Goddess.

She wants your animal-man within. No Himsa should be committed on the excuse that it is for the Devi. You have no right or justification to hurt any living creature for whatever reason.

Ahimsa should be free from all exemptions whether pertaining to class, place, time or circumstances. Ahimsa is a universal vow to be practiced absolutely. No worship, no prayer, no act whatsoever in life can justify injury or harm done to living beings. Even self-protection can not justify murder.

The offering of the self, the surrender of the ego to the Divinity is the supreme sacrifice. Nothing is superior to it.

Swami Sivananda

Read more at www.hindu-blog.com
 

Right, so tell me again how the “free market” is the best way to manage health-care delivery

An editorial from 2007 shows how research into three promising anticancer drugs has been abandoned. The reason is that the compounds on which the drugs are based cannot be patented (melatonin, for example), which means that pharma companies are unlikely to turn a profit. Understandable, from the perspective of the pharma companies, but unconscionable, from the perspective of cancer patients.

Amplifyd from www.nytimes.com
New York Times
Patents Over Patients

WE could make faster progress against cancer by changing the way drugs are developed. In the current system, if a promising compound can’t be patented, it is highly unlikely ever to make it to market — no matter how well it performs in the laboratory. The development of new cancer drugs is crippled as a result.

Early this year, another readily available industrial chemical, dichloroacetate, was found by researchers at the University of Alberta to shrink tumors in laboratory animals by up to 75 percent. However, as a university news release explained, dichloroacetate is not patentable, and the lead researcher is concerned that it may be difficult to find funding from private investors to test the chemical. So the university is soliciting public donations to finance a clinical trial.

Potential anticancer drugs should be judged on their scientific merit, not on their patentability.Read more at www.nytimes.com
 

“Why I threw the shoe,” by Muntazer al-Zaidi

From the piece: “When I threw the shoe in the face of the criminal, George Bush, I wanted to express my rejection of his lies, his occupation of my country, my rejection of his killing my people. My rejection of his plundering the wealth of my country, and destroying its infrastructure. And casting out its sons into a diaspora.”

Amplifyd from www.guardian.co.uk
guardian.co.uk home

Why I threw the shoe

We used to be a nation in which the Arab would share with the Turkman and the Kurd and the Assyrian and the Sabean and the Yazid his daily bread. And the Shia would pray with the Sunni in one line. And the Muslim would celebrate with the Christian the birthday of Christ. This despite the fact that we shared hunger under sanctions for more than a decade.

Our patience and our solidarity did not make us forget the oppression. But the invasion divided brother from brother, neighbour from neighbour. It turned our homes into funeral tents.

I am not a hero. But I have a point of view. I have a stance. It humiliated me to see my country humiliated; and to see my Baghdad burned, my people killed.
I travelled through my burning land and saw with my own eyes the pain of the victims, and heard with my own ears the screams of the orphans and the bereaved. And a feeling of shame haunted me like an ugly name because I was powerless.Read more at www.guardian.co.uk